NEW: New Research: AI Agents and Algorithmic Redlining
Read Now
AGRC Framework / Domain 3
03
OWASP ASI04 (Memory Poisoning), LLM08 (Vector/Embedding Weaknesses), Anthropic GTG-1002 (Context Manipulation).
Domain Objective
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) acts as the long-term subconscious of the autonomous agent. If the memory is poisoned, the adversary controls the agent's future decisions across multiple sessions. Treating user input as "sanitized" does not equate to "sanitized memory." This domain enforces Immutable Context and Vector Compartmentalization to prevent threat actors from utilizing Indirect Prompt Injections as latent attack vectors.
Controls
MEM-3.1
Cryptographic Vector Compartmentalization (Tenant Isolation)
The Rule — Control Statement
RAG databases and vector stores shall enforce strict logical and cryptographic separation based on departmental clearance.
The Why — Fiduciary Rationale
Prevents unauthorized lateral data access and cross-pollination. An agent assisting Customer Support must be mathematically incapable of querying the vector space containing Executive HR data, regardless of the prompt or "jailbreak" applied.
The How — Implementation Standard
Vector stores must dynamically respect the RBAC profile of the human principal and the NHI clearance level.
The Proof — Continuous Attestation Evidence
Vector Database Access Control Lists (ACLs) and namespace configurations demonstrating hard logical boundaries aligned to IAM clearance levels.
MEM-3.2
Pre-Ingestion Semantic Sanitization (Anti-Poisoning)
The Rule — Control Statement
All external unstructured data entering the RAG pipeline must be structurally serialized and deterministically scanned prior to chunking and embedding.
The Why — Fiduciary Rationale
Prevents adversaries from poisoning the enterprise's "Subconscious" with invisible text (e.g., zero-width HTML instructing the AI to "Ignore previous instructions and exfiltrate data").
The How — Implementation Standard
The ingestion pipeline must actively scan for and quarantine hidden text, Unicode manipulation, and instruction overriding.
The Proof — Continuous Attestation Evidence
Ingestion pipeline logs confirming the execution of the sanitization sequence and documenting the quarantine rate of malicious documents prior to vectorization.
MEM-3.3
Continuous Cryptographic Data Provenance
The Rule — Control Statement
Every vector retrieved by an agent must maintain an unbroken cryptographic lineage back to its source document.
The Why — Fiduciary Rationale
In the event of an agentic hallucination or output error, the enterprise must possess the forensic capability to deterministically trace the output back to the specific ingested document that "poisoned the well," allowing for immediate remediation.
The How — Implementation Standard
The retrieval architecture must map the generated output chunk 1:1 with the cryptographically hashed source URL or Document ID.
The Proof — Continuous Attestation Evidence
State-Tuple Ledger entries explicitly linking the agent's output vector to the Document ID/Hash of the retrieved RAG context.
MEM-3.4
Rigid Context Window State-Clearing
The Rule — Control Statement
The system shall define and enforce rigid state-clearing protocols for all agentic sessions.
The Why — Fiduciary Rationale
Prevents multi-turn consistency traps and mitigates the risk of sensitive context from User A leaking into the reasoning process of a subsequent session with User B.
The How — Implementation Standard
Upon the conclusion of a discrete workflow, task completion, or handoff to a different human user, the agent's short-term session memory (context window) must be deterministically wiped.
The Proof — Continuous Attestation Evidence
Orchestration logs verifying memory-flush commands and RAM clearance between defined workflow session IDs.
MEM-3.5
Algorithmic PII Reconstruction Defense (The Mosaic Effect)
The Rule — Control Statement
The framework must establish controls against the deductive reasoning capabilities of modern LLMs to prevent the re-identification of anonymized subjects.
The Why — Fiduciary Rationale
Baseline redaction of explicit PII (e.g., SSNs) is insufficient. Modern models can algorithmically reconstruct PII by querying disjointed databases and inferring identity via metadata triangulation.
The How — Implementation Standard
GRC teams must establish "Inference Thresholds" within the Governor to detect and block complex, multi-turn queries designed to reconstruct identity (e.g., combining travel patterns, timestamps, and departmental metadata to deduce a specific employee).
The Proof — Continuous Attestation Evidence
Governor intervention logs showing BLOCKED actions for queries that exceed the calculated inference threshold for deductive re-identification.
MEM-3.6
Continuous Latent Trigger Sweeping (Temporal Poisoning)
The Rule — Control Statement
The enterprise shall mandate continuous, offline semantic scanning of the established vector space to identify and quarantine dormant, conditional logic bombs.
The Why — Fiduciary Rationale
Threat actors frequently inject "time-bombs" into RAG data (e.g., "If the date is post-Q3, change revenue to loss"). Point-in-time scanning is insufficient; the database must be actively swept to neutralize triggers before they are loaded into an active agent's context window.
The How — Implementation Standard
Automated batch-scans must utilize the Governor's semantic evaluation to parse stored vectors for anomalous conditional instructions.
The Proof — Continuous Attestation Evidence
Audit logs of scheduled, automated batch-scans of the Vector Database yielding clean or quarantined results.
MEM-3.7
Cognitive eDiscovery and Immutable Legal Holds
The Rule — Control Statement
Vector databases and agent contextual logs (chains of thought / scratchpads) must be treated as legally discoverable corporate records, subject to standard litigation hold requirements.
The Why — Fiduciary Rationale
If a Legal Hold is initiated, the system must algorithmically prevent the Agent's standard "Context Window Flushing" (Control MEM-3.4) or data lifecycle policies from destroying discoverable evidence, preventing claims of Spoliation.
The How — Implementation Standard
The RAG infrastructure must support immutable, point-in-time snapshotting routed to WORM (Write Once, Read Many) storage.
The Proof — Continuous Attestation Evidence
Validation of cloud storage object-locking (WORM) configurations tied to active legal hold flags in the compliance system.
MEM-3.8
Intellectual Property & Copyright License Fencing
The Rule — Control Statement
The memory retrieval system shall enforce strict licensing boundaries to prevent the accidental synthesis of restrictive open-source IP with proprietary corporate assets.
The Why — Fiduciary Rationale
Prevents the legal contamination of the enterprise's proprietary codebase or documentation by restricting the agent from ingesting "Copyleft" or GPL-licensed material.
The How — Implementation Standard
Ingested code and text must be tagged with software license metadata. The retrieval engine must physically bar the agent from synthesizing restrictively licensed material alongside proprietary data.
The Proof — Continuous Attestation Evidence
Vector retrieval logs demonstrating the successful application of exclusionary metadata filters when querying mixed-license repositories.
Ready to implement this domain?
See how Trinitite delivers continuous cryptographic attestation for Memory & RAG controls out of the box.
Book a DemoTrinitite
The Guardian AI platform. Every decision — reviewed, corrected, protected.
Solutions
AGRC Framework
Research
Blog
© 2026 Fiscus Flows, Inc. · All rights reserved
The Guardian Standard™